Re: [css-grid][css-align] Intrinsic size of replaced elements, and no shrink-to-fit algorithm

On 15/05/15 23:38, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Fran├žois REMY
> <> wrote:
>>>>> Are you looking at
>>>>> for the
>>>>> definition of "stretch"? Note that this is different than the
>>>>> justify-content definition.  In particular, it'll shrink too-big things.
>>>> I'm speaking about the default behavior of a grid item. I'm not sure what is
>>> the default value of all the align properties in the case of a grid, though.
>>>> I would be interested in what happens in both cases though.
>>> Just read the spec; "auto" computes to "stretch", and "stretch" makes it
>>> match the size of the alignment container (without regard as to whether it's
>>> bigger or smaller).
>> Hum, this isn't what I implemented. I am pretty sure this was the behavior I initially implemented and I got feedback this wasn't the expected behavior. In particular, both IE and Chrome seem not to shrink-to-fit by default.
>> Am I missing something?
> What the spec now says and what early implementations are doing don't
> always match up. ^_^

This reminds me to this thread:

The conclusion I got but that time was that even if grid items have
"stretch" by default, they're rendered as inline-blocks so they do not
shrink to fit. Maybe I'm missing something.

My 2 cents,

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 09:44:35 UTC