Re: [css-break] Nested fragmentainers and break types

On 03/20/2015 08:06 PM, Brady Duga wrote:
> I am confused by section 2.2. Given a page fragmentainer context which contains a multi-column fragmentainer context, if there
> is a page break in the content it sounds like there is only a page break, not a column break since the type of break that was
> created by the page context was a page break. But the example directly contradicts this, saying in this case there is both a
> page and column break. Am I misreading the way the break type is calculated, or is the example explicitly calling out an
> exception to the rule?

The example is calling out an exception (multi-column boxes).
I've split that part out into a separate note. Let me know
if this helps.

   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-break/#nested-flows

~fantasai