- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 15:13:23 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/20/2015 08:06 PM, Brady Duga wrote: > I am confused by section 2.2. Given a page fragmentainer context which contains a multi-column fragmentainer context, if there > is a page break in the content it sounds like there is only a page break, not a column break since the type of break that was > created by the page context was a page break. But the example directly contradicts this, saying in this case there is both a > page and column break. Am I misreading the way the break type is calculated, or is the example explicitly calling out an > exception to the rule? The example is calling out an exception (multi-column boxes). I've split that part out into a separate note. Let me know if this helps. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-break/#nested-flows ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 04:13:51 UTC