Re: [css-break] Review: minor issues

On 03/20/2015 06:54 PM, Brady Duga wrote:
> I just finished reviewing http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-break/ and thought I would start with a few minor issues:
>
> 1. For "break-inside", the "Applies to" section has an extra ‘that’.
>
> 2. In section 4, second paragraph ‘auto’ is a link to the auto value of break-inside. While this is the same name, it is not
> the auto it is referring to. One reference is to overflow and the other is to logical height.
>
> 3. In 4.1, the sentence “... and may instead either slice the element's graphical representation as necessary to fragment it.”
> has an either but no or. Maybe drop the either?

Fixed, thanks!

~fantasai

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 04:13:50 UTC