- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:23:55 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/16/2015 05:35 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > On 05/03/15 17:11, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: >> 3) I think there is something missing in the track sizing algorithm. The >> new 'auto' value adds a new step before resolving the content-based >> minimums which is called intrinsic minimums (which includes >> min-content,max-content and auto). That's fine, the problem is that >> there isn't any correspondent new step in step 3 of the distribute extra >> space algorithm[2]. That step describes which tracks should be selected >> to grow beyond grow limits depending on which sizes we're currently >> handling. For base sizes it only considers min-content and max-content >> but not auto. > > BTW the new step will produce wrong results because auto != min-content > for min track sizing functions. There was a rule that specifies which > tracks to grow beyond limits when dealing with min-content base sizes. > Before this new value of "auto", the auto tracks were selected to grow > beyond limits (as auto was minmax(min-content,max-content) but now > they're excluded. > > My proposal to keep compatibility with the current behavior is to replace: > > "when handling min-content base sizes:" > > by > > "when handling min-content or auto base sizes:" Seems right to us! Fixed. Thank you~ ~fantasai and TJ
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 23:24:25 UTC