On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the explanations. I feel like 9.1 (.0) should not say > "Absolutely-positioned children of a flex container do not participate > in flex layout" anymore, because they kind of do, just in a special > way. Maybe make that say "Absolutely-positioned children of a flex > container participate in flex layout according to section 4.1 only". They don't participate in flex layout. They do a special thing that invokes a simplified version of flex layout. But flex layout itself, as in, the layout of the flex container via the layout algorithm, does not let abspos children participate. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 21:35:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:54 UTC