W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] intrinsic sizing

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 06:54:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAUdVbXSXt3xx_OZi0j4MJAWuWNNBzXVNQ-aT0Z67o6jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Christian Biesinger
<cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:19 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> As dholbert pointed out, forced page/column breaks can introduce
>> forced flex line breaks. Note this only happens for column flex
>> containers. (Forced breaks on flex items in a row get propagated
>> to the row.)
>
> Wait, hold on, are you saying that for @media screen (and without
> columns, etc) that break-after: always will be ignored for multi-line
> row flexboxes?

Hm, that is a correct reading of the section, but I don't think it's
what was intended.  At the very least, "all" (and the hypothetical
"flex-line" value) should cause a flex-line break.

fantasai?

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 13:55:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:54 UTC