- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 15:51:17 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > The appendix is here > http://www.w3.org/TR/WOFF2/#IMT > > On the call, Tab pointed out that for your purposes you would also > want the historically used application/* types (both those registered, > like TrueDoc PFR, and those used but not registered). > > If that appendix is an acceptable location for the list, a new section > on historical and unregistered types could be added to list them. That seems fine to me. Ideally I would prefer an enumerated list of just the "font MIME types" since that is what eventually needs to end up in code. Do I need to follow up with anyone or is that already being done? > On the call, CS WG decided to delegate the issue to WebFonts WG and > to declare it out of scope for CSS WG. Which is fine, as @font-face > makes no use of the internet media Type for font loading and we don't > plan to change that; the format descriptor remains authoritative. Well, once CSS finally starts using Fetch to load resources @font-face would have its MIME types enforced for responses that carry the X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header. And probably in browsers before that day comes. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2015 13:51:43 UTC