- From: Kenneth Moore <kenneth.moore@ungerboeck.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:45:44 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN3PR0701MB1314BDFF84472002A99DD89E9D080@BN3PR0701MB1314.namprd07.prod.outlook.>
Good Afternoon, I believe that flexbox specification is omitting a very useful feature, as it does not include the ability to target 'flex-lines' within a multiline flex container (from a CSS rule). To accomplish this the flexbox spec could include a new flex-line pseudo-element. I imagine the implementation would be similar to the pattern used by the 'first-line' pseudo-element. But, a flex-line pseudo-element would have to target each flex-line, not just the first. For Example: * .flex-container::flex-line Selects each flex-line within a flex container * .flex-container::flex-line > .flex-item:first-child Selects the first flex-item of each flex-line * .flex-container::flex-line > .flex-item:last-child Selects the last flex-item of each flex-line It could also work with other pseudo-selectors for added utility: * .flex-container::flex-line:nth-child(even) Selects even flex-lines * .flex-container::flex-line:not(:first-child) Selects every flex-line except the first Flex-box spec claims that it that 'flex lines are hypothetical containers used for grouping and alignment by the layout algorithm'. It kind of makes sense that a hypothetical container would be a pseudo-element. This would be very useful in situations where you are applying a border and border-radius to a series flex items that could wrap. There are many design patterns that make use of ":first-child" and ":last-child" to prevent borders from stacking and to set an appropriate border-radius on edge elements. These design patterns even apply to flex based layouts. Since flexbox solves so many CSS layout issues I figure It could also solve something that is nearly impossible to do as of now. Is this a feature worth consideration? Kenneth Moore User Experience Designer Ungerboeck Software International Kenneth.Moore@Ungerboeck.com<mailto:Kenneth.Moore@Ungerboeck.com>
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 20:46:18 UTC