W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2015

Re: [mediaqueries] @media screen and (foo) or (baz)

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:42:51 +0100
Message-ID: <5510A4FB.6050709@exyr.org>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 23/03/15 20:54, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> Since the intention is for media types to be phased out, you should
> not run into this case too often.


> And when the media type is omitted, I wouldn't want to have mandatory
> parentheses, nor would I want them when the media type is followed by
> a media condition made of a single media feature (and that wouldn't
> be backwards compatible anyway).

I’m not suggesting requiring parentheses in any of these cases, only is 
cases (the one case, really) that are ambiguous modulo precedence of 
'or' v.s. 'and'.


> If you think it is worth special casing the grammar for dealing with
> the limited case that remains once you've removed that, I am not
> really opposed to it.

I don’t have a strong opinion, but since the grammar seemed to be have 
been designed to avoid this kind of ambiguity, I just wanted to bring up 
this corner case that might have been unintentional.

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 23:43:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC