- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:42:51 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 23/03/15 20:54, Florian Rivoal wrote: > Since the intention is for media types to be phased out, you should > not run into this case too often. > And when the media type is omitted, I wouldn't want to have mandatory > parentheses, nor would I want them when the media type is followed by > a media condition made of a single media feature (and that wouldn't > be backwards compatible anyway). I’m not suggesting requiring parentheses in any of these cases, only is cases (the one case, really) that are ambiguous modulo precedence of 'or' v.s. 'and'. > If you think it is worth special casing the grammar for dealing with > the limited case that remains once you've removed that, I am not > really opposed to it. I don’t have a strong opinion, but since the grammar seemed to be have been designed to avoid this kind of ambiguity, I just wanted to bring up this corner case that might have been unintentional. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 23:43:17 UTC