W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2015

[css-break] Review: minor issues

From: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:54:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKpG1kH+JX=fWrcTb_vKhnbPfR5YaNWpaichmLkCoQoMJxh94w@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
I just finished reviewing http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-break/ and thought I
would start with a few minor issues:

1. For "break-inside", the "Applies to" section has an extra ‘that’.

2. In section 4, second paragraph ‘auto’ is a link to the auto value of
break-inside. While this is the same name, it is not the auto it is
referring to. One reference is to overflow and the other is to logical

3. In 4.1, the sentence “... and may instead either slice the element's
graphical representation as necessary to fragment it.” has an either but no
or. Maybe drop the either?
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 22:54:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC