- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:11:43 -0700
- To: Andrew VanWagoner <thetalecrafter@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Andrew VanWagoner <thetalecrafter@gmail.com> wrote: > I've made an attempt to contrast against another color in a branch of > css-color-function: > [snip] > > Here's what I think is the key: Knowing the direction of maximum > color, we can calculate the minimum contrast color's luminosity, and > as we move toward the maximum color, the luminosity of base color > changes monotonically. We also know which luminosity will be larger > when contrast ratio is calculated. > > That does mean that in the contrast curve between the base color and > the background color, the colors where contrast decreases are > unreachable. > > For the #808080 problem, perhaps a better way to determine the > direction of the maximum is which provides a better contrast ratio, > instead of lum < .5. Then the maximum color will be black instead of > white. I haven't tried that yet though. > > I still feel like I might be missing something though. Let me know if > you see anything that doesn't look right. I'm not spending a bunch of time decoding your algo, but I think what you're doing is tracing backwards from the max-contrast color until you hit the min-contrast color for the first time (which'll either be the base color, or an interpolated color somewhere between base and max, if the background color has a luminosity between the base and the max), then doing interpolation normally? This is fine, but as I said, *it might not be what you want*. It means that you're guaranteed to have a sensible way to interpret 0%-100%, but it also means that the 0% color might be *far away* from the base color, leaving you with only a small range of colors near white/black that can be used. Maybe that's okay? It's unfortunate, though, that if the base color is an acceptable contrast level, it won't get chosen in this circumstance. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 00:12:31 UTC