- From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:35:19 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/03/15 17:11, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > 3) I think there is something missing in the track sizing algorithm. The > new 'auto' value adds a new step before resolving the content-based > minimums which is called intrinsic minimums (which includes > min-content,max-content and auto). That's fine, the problem is that > there isn't any correspondent new step in step 3 of the distribute extra > space algorithm[2]. That step describes which tracks should be selected > to grow beyond grow limits depending on which sizes we're currently > handling. For base sizes it only considers min-content and max-content > but not auto. BTW the new step will produce wrong results because auto != min-content for min track sizing functions. There was a rule that specifies which tracks to grow beyond limits when dealing with min-content base sizes. Before this new value of "auto", the auto tracks were selected to grow beyond limits (as auto was minmax(min-content,max-content) but now they're excluded. My proposal to keep compatibility with the current behavior is to replace: "when handling min-content base sizes:" by "when handling min-content or auto base sizes:" BR
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 12:36:09 UTC