W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] min-height on flex items that have an intrinsic aspect ratio

From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:16:27 -0800
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
message-id: <54F5FA7B.3000103@mozilla.com>
On 03/03/2015 10:13 AM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> With your change (allowing definite values in "flex-basis" to influence
> resolved min-width:auto), this will allow shrinkage below the
> min-content width (and cause overflow) when authors specify e.g. "flex:
> 1", which would make "flex: 1" much more dangerous to use.

(er, pedantic self-nit: "shrinkage" was the wrong term to use there, since in this example we'd be flexing from 0.  "insufficient growth" is really what I meant to say.)
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 18:16:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC