Re: [css-syntax][css-fonts] Wrapping up the <unicode-range> thing

On 27/06/15 10:47, fantasai wrote:
> I'd argue that we may want to
> allow implementations to use context-specific parsing rules as
> well, if they want to go that route instead, so the UA would be
> allowed to either accept or reject u+a/**/rea. (A full CSS parser
> might not want to do that, but a Selectors parser shouldn't have
> to deal with unicode-range token munging. Ditto An+B, now I think
> about it.)

Allowing a different behavior without mandating it reduces interop, and 
this doesn’t seem to be a good enough reason to do it.

-- 
Simon Sapin

Received on Sunday, 28 June 2015 20:22:06 UTC