- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:03:32 +0200
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Cc: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>, Elika Etemad <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, Masataka Yakura <masataka.yakura@gmail.com>
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 11:35, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> wrote: > >> There seems to be no implicit (and no explicit) range limit to the number of consecutive characters when using 'text-combine-upright: all' but there is a range 2-4 limit with 'text-combine-upright: digits n': >> Q1: is that assumption correct? (To me, this seems odd and incoherent.) > > Correct. > >> Q2: If there is no range limitation with 'text-combine-upright: all', then >> why should there be one with 'text-combine-upright: digits n' where 'n' >> would be a [2-9] digit? > > “all” is not likely to be affected much by the number of characters; it just measure the whole string, and shrink if needed. > > “digits” checks the number of characters, and thus could fail on specific number. A request was made to avoid implementations and testing that were never used in the real world. I agree with Gérard. I understand wanting to limit to 4 digits since there is no use case for more if that makes implementations simpler. I do not understand why the logic is not applied to the all value, allowing it to only match up to 4 digits. - Florian
Received on Monday, 22 June 2015 18:04:09 UTC