- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:10:26 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 16/06/15 09:16, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > On 16/06/15 03:44, fantasai wrote: > >> So with some prompting from Rachel Andrews I finally did that today. :) Great to see this on the spec. >> Except, as per usual, I ran into some issues. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid-1/#gutters >> >> Issue 1: Should 'normal' (the initial value of 'row-gap') compute to '0'? >> >> I say yes, since this would be simpler for authors. Other opinions >> welcome. > > I find it sensible indeed. > >> Issue 2: Should we have a shorthand? What should it be called? >> ('border-spacing' is unavailable because it inherits) >> >> Please go ahead and bikeshed this one... > > track-gap ? Maybe tracks-gap ? >> Issue 3: Should the 'grid' shorthand reset the gap properties? >> >> I say yes, because we want shorthands to give a "blank slate" for >> related >> properties, and resetting the grid should probably also reset the >> gutters. > > I also do agree with reseting. I agree with you too in 1) and 3). Anyway, I think the spec needs an extra modification in the grid sizing algorithm. I guess that the gutters should be subtracted when we calculate the size of the flexible tracks. For example, if you've a grid with "width: 500px; column-gap: 100px; grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;", I guess that the columns should have "200px" width. Bye, Rego
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 22:11:06 UTC