W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2015

Re: [css-text-decor] Doesn't example 3 in text-underline-position break current UA behavior?

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:41:11 -0400
Message-ID: <557EE407.8000701@inkedblade.net>
To: Masayuki Nakano <masayuki@d-toybox.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/11/2015 04:50 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote:
> In EXAMPLE3 of text-underline-position <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#example-affafc32>, it suggests UA should use
> following style in its default UA style sheet:
> :root:lang(ja), [lang|=ja],
> :root:lang(ko), [lang|=ko] {
>    text-underline-position: under right;
> }
> :root:lang(zh), [lang|=zh] {
>    text-underline-position: under left;
> }
> This means that UA should use "under" for horizontal writing mode too. And even if it has some Western language contents
> (e.g., in <blockquote>), the underlines in it are rendered as "under". I think that |:root| is not necessary.
> And also current CJK web pages are rendered as |text-underline-position: auto;|. So, if UA style sheel had the suggested
> style, rendering result of CJK web pages would be changed. So, I think that the possible value of text-underline-position
> should be [auto|under] || [left|right].
> If not so, if there were the UA which supports text-underline-position but doesn't support vertical writing mode, web pages
> which have |text-underline-position: left;| or |text-underline-position: right;| only for vertical writing contents would be
> rendered with the underlines positioned "under" even though the contents are rendered horizontally.

Hi Masayuki,
I think you are correct, and I will raise this to the WG.
I expect we will update the spec as you suggest.

Received on Monday, 15 June 2015 14:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:54 UTC