- From: Hyojin Song <hyojin22.song@lge.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:29:03 +0900
- To: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Florian Rivoal'" <florian@rivoal.net>, "'Jonathan Kingston'" <jonathan@jooped.com>, "'www-style list'" <www-style@w3.org>
I definitely understand the explanation Tab mentioned, and I applied the contents in CSS Round Display spec a moment ago. I couldn't find any information about bearing angles (0deg = up). Even though the information is internalized in several CSS and SVG spec, I think it would be specified in CSS Values and Units Module spec or any other similar spec. Thanks for the important information, TJ, Florian, and Jonathan. ~hyojin -----Original Message----- From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 4:01 AM To: Florian Rivoal Cc: Hyojin Song; Jonathan Kingston; www-style list Subject: Re: [css-round-display] comments on CSS round On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > The convention in math is as you say, but other uses of <angle> in css > have positive values go clockwise, and with 0 at the top. There aren't > that many uses yet, but I think it would be good to be consistent. I'll make a stronger statement - we MUST be consistent, and the pattern that CSS and SVG have already established is bearing angles (0deg = up, positive angles = clockwise). ~TJ
Received on Friday, 5 June 2015 00:29:43 UTC