- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:54:02 -0700
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20150603035402.GA19237@pescadero.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2015-06-03 11:35 +0900, Koji Ishii wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:25 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday 2015-06-03 04:00 +0900, Koji Ishii wrote: > >> I'd like to propose: > >> > >> writing-mode: sideways-left > >> > >> which is equivalent to setting the two properties: > >> writing-mode: vertical-lr; > >> text-orientation: sideways-left; > > > > CSS doesn't have properties where some of their values reset another > > property but some don't. So are you proposing that writing-mode > > always become a shorthand that includes text-orientation? (And, if > > so, is there now a longhand corresponding to the actual value in > > writing-mode?) > > Ah, no. I meant to "move the value to writing-mode", so > "text-orientation: sideways-left" is gone in this proposal. Sorry for > not clarifying that in the original post. Otherwise we're not solving > issues. ... > I need better wording for the spec, but is the intention clear now? I still don't follow. With your proposal: (1) what values does 'writing-mode' take? (2) what values does 'text-orientation' take? -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 03:54:29 UTC