- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:44:05 +0900
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAN9ydbUmTq4RgC-sFui2M8R50K=b12oD+UF2-ypqdsv5jZsYSw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > >> Koji Ishii: >> > I'm good with the proposal. Gecko and Trident already handle them as >> value >> > aliases. I'm still under planning of how to unprefix writing-mode in >> Blink, >> > but I think what Gecko did is the only reasonable choice. >> >> FYI, Gecko does not support the old keyword values in our new Writing >> Modes implementation. >> > > Thank you for the info, I misunderstood when we discussed about > inheriting writing-mode from HTML to SVG. > > I wrote a simple test how Gecko handles this[1] and figured out that I > was wrong: > > 1. Gecko supports "vertical-rl" both in HTML and SVG and inherits > 2. Gecko no longer supports "tb*" in either HTML nor SVG > > It was a bit of surprising to me that Gecko does not recognize "tb" in > SVG. Is this intentional? I can't find "vertical-rl" in SVG 1.1 nor 2.0. Is > it in 3.0 draft? > > > writing-mode (as many other CSS properties) was first defined in a SVG > spec and will now be described by a CSS module under the supervision of the > CSS WG. (In this case the CSS WG is also the author of the spec.) > > You won’t find a description of writing-mode in SVG 2 or any other > future version of SVG. Instead SVG will reference the CSS module directly. > > Greetings, > Dirk > > [1] http://jsbin.com/diluka/edit?html,output > > Thanks, I found it's marked as an issue in SVG 2 spec[2]. I have to run by Blink community but SVG writing-mode has 0.3% usage, it looks early to drop "tb" at this moment to me, so Gecko Nightly already dropped "tb" in SVG context was a bit surprise. If we had to keep "tb" in SVG for a while, value aliasing looks the most reasonable option, and that was what I wanted to say in the previous post. I didn't even consider but dropping them in SVG is technically another option. [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/text.html#SettingInlineProgressionDirection /koji
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2015 00:44:54 UTC