- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:47:57 +1200
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:48:25 UTC
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > > On 15 Jul 2015, at 7:42 AM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > Wouldn't your "system" be equivalent to or duplicative of one or more of > the > > 6 existing "system" fonts on http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-prop > , > > e.g. menu? > > This whole thing is weird. It makes specifying fallback font-families > strange - you now move them to the font shorthand. > Even though you can then override size/weight/etc after the shorthand, it > seems yucky that you have to use a shorthand just to get what is > effectively a font-family. > Per David's email, don't you also need a way to set font size/weight etc to values that match system usage? And isn't the 'font' property the best way to do this? Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:48:25 UTC