- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:30:01 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > This is tricky to phrase well. Which of these 2 (meant to be equivalent) do you like best? > > The first <a>CSS Region</a> in a region chain which is either: > - an element with <a>layout containment</a> itself or > - the last of one or more regions in this chain > to be descendants of the same element with <a>layout containment</a> > is treated as if it was the last region in the chain, and gets all the > remaining content in the associated <a>named flow</a>. Subsequent regions > in the chain do not receive any content from the <a>named flow</a>. Slightly prefer this one. > In either case, we should probably also says what happens in the CSSOM. > I suggest that: > - these subsequent regions that don't get content are > still considered part of the region chain as returned from the > getRegions() method of the NamedFlow interface (if you don't want > that, use contain:style) > - the regionOverset attribute of the Region interface of the region > which eats all the content is set to overset if the content doesn't > fit. The current regions spec only allows this value on the last > region in the chain, but it's behaving as if it was. Yes to both. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 22:30:48 UTC