- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:24:48 -0700
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
EXPLICITLY PINGING DIRK On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: >>> http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ says "The DOMRectList interface is >>> at-risk. The authors of this specification await feedback from >>> implementers if the item() function of DOMRectList is currently in use >>> on legacy interfaces. If there is no/not enough content to justify >>> DOMRectList, legacy interfaces must use sequences instead and >>> DOMRectList will be removed from this specification." >>> >>> Chrome 43 reached the stable channel about a week ago, and it had a >>> use counter in Blink to answer this very question: >>> https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/694 >>> >>> Compare that to another use counter also in the same release: >>> https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/696 >>> >>> When usage rounds to zero as for ClientRectList.item(), it means that >>> <0.0001% of page loads are affected. This is no guarantee that >>> replacing ClientRectList with sequence<ClientRect> as the return value >>> of Element.getClientRects() and Range.getClientRects() would be safe, >>> but it's promising. >>> >>> (Dirk Schulze suggested that I notify public-fx and www-style.) >> >> Excellent news. Thanks, Philip! > > Is this issue being tracked somehow, do I need to do something or can > I sit back and wait? > > Philip
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 22:25:35 UTC