- From: Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:38:15 +0300
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Benjamin Poulain <benjamin@webkit.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
29.01.2015, 04:44, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Benjamin Poulain <benjamin@webkit.org> wrote: >> šI agree. It would be a good idea to add something explicit. >> >> šDevelopers can do ugly things to get to the siblings: >> ššššš#target:nth-last-child(2 of #target, #target ~ foo + bar) >> š(e.g. on WebKit Nightly: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/GgvMqP) > > Oh jeez, that's quite a hack. šClever. > > Yeah, if we can simulate previous-sibling via things we have approved, > we should do something about it more directly. Great. What are our next steps to actually add the previous-sibling combinator to the selectors spec and ensure that the current discussion conclusion will not be lost and forgotten? Thanks.
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 21:38:47 UTC