- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:52:05 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, smontagu@smontagu.org, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
The problem of leaving it as at-risk is that another shorter value, "sideways", has a dependency on the at-risk value, and thus is a possible source of an interoperability problem. I prefer deferring earlier than later. Doing so saves test costs as well. /koji On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/13/2015 05:25 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: >> >> I'm not sure saving typing of that 5 keystrokes for non-vertical writing >> in vertical flow is so much more important than for >> not saving 6 keystrokes for Mongolians, but we can defer that discussion >> to Level 4 too, so I'm good with what you said. >> >> So the revised proposal is: defer both 'sideways' and 'sideways-left' to >> Level 4. >> >> Please let us know if any. > > > My preference would be to markt it at-risk. It's not critical for > East Asian typesetting, but it's necessary for certain fairly common > non-East-Asian uses of vertical text such as side captions on the left. > If we don't have enough implementations and it's blocking PR, we drop > it. Otherwise, if it's not blocking, it stays. > > ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 13:52:32 UTC