- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:21:25 +1100
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMdq699DB+X25y5YZ_NsOVbh+9Y+hM1QMKRhpwAmXUOJCZYUZg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It might probably be better to mention that the default style sheet is >>>> not normative, and say that UAs are free to behave a different way for some >>>> of the styles. >>>> >>> >>> It's already there; Appendix A says it's informative. >>> >> >> I meant that it might be better to mention in the Ruby Font Size section >> in addition that font-size: 50% in the default style sheet is not >> normative, and the font size of annotation is actually impl-dependent. But >> I feel that impl-dependent behavior is evil for web standard. I'm not quite >> sure what should happen here. >> > > Yeah, I believe it's technically accurate, but may be confusing. Added a > note to Appendix A.1. How is this? > It looks good to me, thanks. BTW, according to a bopomofo manual from Taiwan [1], the font size of bopomofo annotation is generally 30%, not 33%. (see page 5, the Chinese character is 30:30 in the graph, while bopomofo character is 9:9) It's a small informative fix, though. [1] https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ev8yh5nb9488o8n/AADssbd4gljy-P6jaw6-Z1lba/mandarin_zhuyinfuhou_handbook.pdf?dl=0 - Xidorn
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 22:22:33 UTC