- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:13:15 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/23/2015 10:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:01 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Currently Tab and I are thinking of naming the first concept >> 'max-content' size (since it is a true maximum) and the second concept >> 'preferred' size, at least in the spec. >> >> But as far as authors are concerned, they probably really want the >> 'preferred' size. It's just the layout engine that might need to >> know the max-content size. > > Are you implying that authors probably actually want to invoke the > preferred size in places where they might say "max-content"? Yes. I think in most cases they want the preferred size, not the actual maximum size. > If so, I suggest max-content and super-max-content. ^_^ Sure, why not. :p We can bikeshed it later if we need to expose it to authors. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 24 January 2015 04:13:49 UTC