W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] Renaming flex-basis:auto for less confusion

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:10:14 -0500
Message-ID: <54BDB906.9040000@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 11/03/2014 03:43 PM, Rossen Atanassov wrote:
> Daniel Holbert wrote:
>> I'm open to the alternative proposal ('auto' for size lookup; 'content'
>> for automatic sizing), if it ends up being the case that back-compat issues are
>> too common to fix on a case-by-case basis, though.
>
> I still believe that we should adopt the second proposal of this issue
>  ('auto' / 'content'). It is safer from back-compat POV as well as
> arguably easier to teach/use.

Just to follow up on this, the WG resolved on the alternate proposal:
   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 02:11:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:56 UTC