- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:13:51 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, that's a fascinating way to handle it, and seems like it would be > pretty effective. It cuts out a lot of the confusion about how things > inherit, I think. For reference (not as a proposal), there is a description of the Presto implementation in more detail in an earlier mail [1]. A lot of discussion about ::selection in the same thread. It describes some weird stuff about currentColor and inheritance which I don't remember why we had. > It does involve some weirdness, like the fact that in the rule > "p::selection, div { background-color: pink; }", this sets the > 'background-color' for div, but the 'selection-background-color' for > p::selection. But maybe that's not too horrible. Has it been discussed whether selection styling should be done through a pseudo element at all? Why couldn't it just be separate properties instead, also from the author's point of view? It's probably fine if you support color and background-color only, but you'd get a lot of duplication when more properties are supported, I guess. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010May/0366.html -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 13:14:19 UTC