- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:46:55 +0900
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:47:21 UTC
Great to know we're on the same page. Please allow me a bit of time to make edits for this, along with another question from David. These two need a bit of thinking for me, but since we've got a record here, I hope I'm not delaying your pending patches. /koji On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the reply. Let me confirm if we differ or not. >> >> When the ruby is on single side, I think we're on the same page. >> >> When the ruby is on both sides, and when both ruby are the same height, >> we're still on the same page. >> >> When the ruby is on both sides, but the two ruby are in different height, >> you'd like to add max of the two heights to both sides, while I said adding >> the height for each side is better. >> >> Is my understanding correct? I'm not sure if I read your algorithm 3 >> correctly or not. >> > > Maybe I didn't describe that very clear. I think in all cases, we are the > same. For the last case, in each side, I make the leading just match what > the annotations on this side need. > > - Xidorn >
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:47:21 UTC