Great to know we're on the same page. Please allow me a bit of time to make edits for this, along with another question from David. These two need a bit of thinking for me, but since we've got a record here, I hope I'm not delaying your pending patches. /koji On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the reply. Let me confirm if we differ or not. >> >> When the ruby is on single side, I think we're on the same page. >> >> When the ruby is on both sides, and when both ruby are the same height, >> we're still on the same page. >> >> When the ruby is on both sides, but the two ruby are in different height, >> you'd like to add max of the two heights to both sides, while I said adding >> the height for each side is better. >> >> Is my understanding correct? I'm not sure if I read your algorithm 3 >> correctly or not. >> > > Maybe I didn't describe that very clear. I think in all cases, we are the > same. For the last case, in each side, I make the leading just match what > the annotations on this side need. > > - Xidorn >Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:47:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:47 UTC