W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [css-ruby] About side of additional leading

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:46:55 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbVM_vseL8t+WThMWBrzPBb3XjS40dktM4-LbWyk8Cpmxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Great to know we're on the same page. Please allow me a bit of time to make
edits for this, along with another question from David. These two need a
bit of thinking for me, but since we've got a record here, I hope I'm not
delaying your pending patches.

/koji

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. Let me confirm if we differ or not.
>>
>> When the ruby is on single side, I think we're on the same page.
>>
>> When the ruby is on both sides, and when both ruby are the same height,
>> we're still on the same page.
>>
>> When the ruby is on both sides, but the two ruby are in different height,
>> you'd like to add max of the two heights to both sides, while I said adding
>> the height for each side is better.
>>
>> Is my understanding correct? I'm not sure if I read your algorithm 3
>> correctly or not.
>>
>
> Maybe I didn't describe that very clear. I think in all cases, we are the
> same. For the last case, in each side, I make the leading just match what
> the annotations on this side need.
>
> - Xidorn
>
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:47:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:56 UTC