- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:10:31 +0900
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Clarified that it's UA dependent in Level 1[1]. How UAs render Bopomofo and how much UAs do so interoperably is very unclear to me, so I think this is the best for me as of this point. Please let me know if any. [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ruby/#ruby-size /koji On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> According to documents provided by editors of CLReq, the standard font size >> of bopomofo in inter-character ruby is 30% of the base text, not 50% like >> Japanese ruby. >> >> The current WebKit implementation introduces a new keyword >> -webkit-ruby-text, and interpret this to 25% when ruby-position is >> inter-character, and 50% otherwise. >> >> I suggest that this behavior have its place in the spec, but I'm not sure >> what's the best way to do so. > > Thank you for bringing this up. There was a request for a property to > specify the ruby text size, but from spec-perspective, it was lower > priority so we postponed. So one way is to spec what WebKit does, > either by investigating or by asking, and if you implement, we'll get > two implementations. > > The other option is you do whatever you like internally, and we don't > need to spec. > > Whichever you prefer is fine with me, I just want to avoid to spec > something that is low priority and won't be implemented by at least > two UAs. > > What do you think? > > /koji
Received on Sunday, 11 January 2015 07:10:58 UTC