- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:08:23 -0500
- To: Peter Krauss <ppkrauss@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 27 February 2015 15:08:54 UTC
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Peter Krauss <ppkrauss@gmail.com> wrote: > Since CSS2 we can express the "existence of attributes", > > http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-CSS2/selector.html#h-5.7.1 > > with the *[att]* selector, > > * element[att] {do}* > > and it is easy implement this kind of conditional selector in CSS > parsers... > > The suggestion (or question) here is about use *the same ideia with > elements*, a kind of existence operator, > > * e1 <existenceOperator> e2 {do}* > > to say "if element *e1* exists, selects the *e2* element". > > > * if it is a new suggestion, can I discuss here this subject? > > * if there are *some old discussion about it*, sorry, can somebody reply > with a link? > > ------ > PS: I think that this kind of <*existenceOperator> *can used in a big > subset of (imagined) applications of the problematic > previous-sibling-selector, and also used as a "*trigger*" in event > selectors, like > e1:hover <*existenceOperator*> e2 {do} > > > Can you explain how is that not just e1 e2 {...} ? If there is no e1, the e2 won't match. If there is, it will. -- Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Friday, 27 February 2015 15:08:54 UTC