- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:45:44 +1100
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMdq69_vox_bPnFZq=1ALwkUGRQ4xOSPHybt5PqpzUFJ7EYuCg@mail.gmail.com>
Ping on this problem. On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > The current spec says: > > This value forces the computed value of writing-mode of the ruby > annotation container to be vertical-rl. > > And according to the discussions in CSSWG F2F meeting in Sydney, because > of the cyclic dependency between writing-mode and display, the spec should > be changed to something like > > The writing-mode of a ruby annotation is computed to vertical-rl if the > ruby-position of its container is inter-character. > > But both forms have a problem encountered from the inheriting rule of > anonymous boxes. Since either ruby annotation or its container could be an > anonymous box (but never both), in which case, its computed writing-mode > value cannot be inherited by its descendants. > > I have no idea how to solve this. If the cyclic dependency above is > allowed, though, probably we can say the writing-mode is computed to > vertical-rl for both ruby annotation and ruby annotation container. > > - Xidorn >
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 02:46:52 UTC