W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [CSS:Flexbox] Tab-Index Recommendation

From: Bo J Campbell <bcampbell@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:24:51 -0800
To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Message-ID: <OF4656266E.0A1F3A58-ON88257DF6.0059F868-88257DF6.005A2A97@us.ibm.com>

Hi Daniel,

I am trying to organize a meeting before May in NY so that we can discuss
this topic more at length. The solution of changing the tab-index or
allowing an option for this brought up the possible need for a more
scalable solution. I am currently trying to figure out who would attend
that meeting and having a hard time connecting to create the time. I
suppose this should be a topic at the next meeting.


Bo J Campbell | +1-805-453-0028 | bcampbell@us.ibm.com
Accessibility & User Experience Consultant | IBM Accessibiity | IBM

fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote on 02/20/2015 07:20:12 PM:

> From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
> To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Bo J Campbell/Los
> Angeles/IBM@IBMUS, www-style@w3.org
> Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai
> <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
> Date: 02/20/2015 07:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Flexbox Tab-Index Recommendation
> On 12/05/2014 06:56 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> > Hi Bo,
> >
> > I'm unclear where this thread left things -- do you know if there's
> > still a proposal coming here?
> >
> > Also, do you know if the flexbox spec editors have expressed an opinion
> > on the high-level idea in the proposal -- changing "order" to influence
> > tab-index? When I read your initial email, I'd assumed that they were
> > part of the TPAC discussion that you mentioned -- but based on the rest
> > of the thread, I'm guessing that they were not actually involved. I'm
> > curious what their thoughts are on this...
> We're currently against changing the spec, but we expect to have further
> discussion on the topic.
> ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 17:02:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC