- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:26:24 +0900
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > > In addition, I don't want to see that the syntax of ruby-position becomes > more complicated only for some rarely used or even imaginary use cases. I > think adding a single keyword value, whatever it is 'auto' or 'alternate', > to the list is enough to address the existing use cases. I agree, I like the simplest solution that works for the foreseeable needs. Fixing and extending shouldn't be too hard if new needs appear. > I have an idea which wouldn't complicate the existing syntax, but may covers > a bit more use cases is that, we use keyword like 'opposite' instead, which > means the position is opposite to the position before. If it is the first > level, or the position of the previous level is 'inter-character', it is > equal to 'over'. Sounds good if "first under" is something we'd like to take care of in level 1, but I think it's beyond the basic ruby. Isn't index-based (slightly) easier to implement? /koji
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 12:26:51 UTC