W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] editorial nits

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:13:30 -0500
Message-ID: <54E7E9CA.30805@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 10/13/2014 08:08 PM, Alan Stearns wrote:
> None of these are substantial, ignore at will.
> The "skip past the following" link should probably link to the next
> section instead of skipping over it.

The next section is kindof boring, too. I adjusted the link text instead.

> Why is there an <hr> in section 4.1? The sheep confused me.

Removed. It was leftover from a more complex section structure.

> I first read the two instances of "and is that size" in section 4.5 as
> clauses to the preceding if statements. It might be better to recast these
> as "is X if Y, otherwise it is undefined"


> Given the possibility of negative leftover free space, you could change
> "empty space" to just "space" in the definitions of justify-content:center
> and align-content:center.


> There are a bunch of unlinked instances of ‘cross size’ and ‘main size’
> and one unlinked ‘flex base size’ (I didn’t check any other terms). I’m
> not sure if it’s really important to add more links, since I could always
> see a linked instance near by an unlinked instance.

Ok, fixed.

Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 02:13:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC