- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:13:30 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 10/13/2014 08:08 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > None of these are substantial, ignore at will. > > The "skip past the following" link should probably link to the next > section instead of skipping over it. The next section is kindof boring, too. I adjusted the link text instead. > Why is there an <hr> in section 4.1? The sheep confused me. Removed. It was leftover from a more complex section structure. > I first read the two instances of "and is that size" in section 4.5 as > clauses to the preceding if statements. It might be better to recast these > as "is X if Y, otherwise it is undefined" Fixed. > Given the possibility of negative leftover free space, you could change > "empty space" to just "space" in the definitions of justify-content:center > and align-content:center. Fixed. > There are a bunch of unlinked instances of ‘cross size’ and ‘main size’ > and one unlinked ‘flex base size’ (I didn’t check any other terms). I’m > not sure if it’s really important to add more links, since I could always > see a linked instance near by an unlinked instance. Ok, fixed. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 02:13:58 UTC