- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:58:43 +0400
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Benjamin Poulain" <benjamin@webkit.org>
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:44:56 +0400, Benjamin Poulain <benjamin@webkit.org> wrote: >>>> * It avoids having to remember which one was used when parsing >> >> This is the stronger reason in my opinion. Also see >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0603.html > This is a very different case. > Here the selector has nothing special that needs extra storage, you can > just defined a new ">>" combinator in the list of combinators. That does > not require any memory. > > In WebKit, I opted to use our bitflags for simplicity, but that's pretty > much the same: it does not require any special treatment or any extra > memory. OK. In that case I'm happy to match your implementation. https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/108d7e3ff204 -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 08:59:16 UTC