On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:44:56 +0400, Benjamin Poulain <benjamin@webkit.org> wrote: >>>> * It avoids having to remember which one was used when parsing >> >> This is the stronger reason in my opinion. Also see >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0603.html > This is a very different case. > Here the selector has nothing special that needs extra storage, you can > just defined a new ">>" combinator in the list of combinators. That does > not require any memory. > > In WebKit, I opted to use our bitflags for simplicity, but that's pretty > much the same: it does not require any special treatment or any extra > memory. OK. In that case I'm happy to match your implementation. https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/108d7e3ff204 -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Friday, 13 February 2015 08:59:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC