- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:23:18 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, Clive Chan <doobahead@gmail.com>, Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Feb 11, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > `el:has(+sibling)` Wouldn't that be `el:has(+next-sibling)`? The plus sign wouldn't determine if there were siblings that were non-adjacent to el, would it? That is why I'd want `el:has(~following-sibling)` too.
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 04:23:46 UTC