> On Feb 11, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > `el:has(+sibling)` Wouldn't that be `el:has(+next-sibling)`? The plus sign wouldn't determine if there were siblings that were non-adjacent to el, would it? That is why I'd want `el:has(~following-sibling)` too.Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 04:23:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC