- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:51:29 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/22/2015 05:58 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Célian Veyssière <contact@celian.eu <mailto:contact@celian.eu>> wrote: > > > > Is there something planned for automatic cutting fragments and to hide identical hiragana to avoid this ? > > We can only do the second. And in my opinion, it is better that you split them as much as possible, so that it can be styled > more flexible. So, for your example, I think it is better to write: > > <ruby> > <rb>亜<rb>樹<rb>ゆ<rb>す<rb>子</rb> > <rt>あ<rt>ぎ<rt>ゆ<rt>す<rt>こ</rt> > </ruby> What Xidorn writes is correct. The spec requires hiding of text when it is identical to the base. > For this case, I would suggest the css-text spec to add hiragana and katakana to text-transform, and apply this property on > the annotation. So, might be something like: > > <ruby> > <rb>G<rb>ユウスケ</rb> > <rt>ジー<rt style="text-transform: hiragana">ユウスケ</rt> > </ruby> > > I guess it probably makes more sense. I think it doesn't make sense to provide a ruby annotation if it's only *styled* differently. :) So I don't think this is a case we can solve; the author has to hide it manually. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 7 February 2015 05:18:07 UTC