W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-ruby] Tone mark of bopomofo in ruby

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:27:58 +0000
Message-ID: <54D0F70E.4020104@w3.org>
To: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
for the light tone, we may want to check with the Unicode folks.  I'll 
send an email.  There was some previous question about this quite some 
time back, but it wasn't conclusive (and tailed off into discussions 
about pinyin).


On 03/02/2015 13:36, Bobby Tung wrote:
>> I guess yes. But before that, Bobby, could you answer the question
>> Richard raised in his post that, is the before placement just be a
>> convention appropriate to dictionaries and phonetic annotations, or be
>> the way the light tone ought to be handled in all cases?
> I think it's convention to dictionaries. But since we don't have any
> official rule, I'd like to make a deal let the light tone placed before.
> First we make tool to generate ruby marked HTML for author, then hope
> IMEs and word process software like Word and Pages to output in right order.
> In my experience to deal such thing with MOE Taiwan. It's not easy to
> give official statement but if there's any reference about Bopomofo.
> They will review and give feedback.
> WANDERER Bobby Tung
> Sent from my iPhone.
> Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com <mailto:quanxunzhen@gmail.com>> 於
> 2015年2月2日 上午10:14 寫道:
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com
>> <mailto:kojiishi@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     So, are we concluded that the reordering of the light tone marks is no
>>     longer an issue?
>> If light tone should be handled this way in all cases, then I think
>> the answer would definitely be yes.
>> - Xidorn
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:28:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC