W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] Behaviour of percentage heights in column direction

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:18:00 -0500
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <5660BF98.8060600@inkedblade.net>
On 03/02/2015 07:00 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
>> On 02/24/2015 04:51 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
>>>   (1) This thread here: "should we make 'min-height:auto' taint the resulting flexed height on a vertical flex item & make it indefinite?" (I slightly lean towards 'yes' for perf reasons; Greg disagrees; I'm OK either way.)
>>> Link to thread (hey, you're already here!):
>>>    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0205.html
>>
>> Answer: no, min-height:auto doesn't make something indefinite.
>> * Spec change needed: clarify section 9.8 (1st sentence at least) to mention that "definite sizes" *can* in fact depend (in part) on content measurements.
>
> Er, actually, Tab's email from later on today[1] seems to contradict this.  (IIUC he's saying there that min-height:auto *should* make things indefinite.)
>
> So, this issue may still be a bit up in the air.

To close off this issue, we ended up discussing this
with everyone here and concluding on multi-pass layout:
   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0014.html

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 22:18:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC