- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:28:40 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/02/2015 05:18 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote: > > So, this was not clear in this thread, but I was always wondering > about the expected *width* in the presence of a (max-)*height*, for > column flexboxes. fantasai cleared up where this is defined for the > actual layout, so now I only have the question left about the > *intrinsic* width. > > In other words, this testcase: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/pJLwYp > > You say "vertical lines, whose breaking is affected by the height" but > in the intrinsic size algorithm I don't see any mention that the > breaking is affected by the height. Instead it says "Place all flex > items into lines of infinite length." which is literally the opposite > of them being affected by the height. > > Greg: for your other reply just now, I'm talking specifically about > the intrinsic size part of the spec - > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#intrinsic-sizes Ah. That's *this* issue: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/issues-lc-20150514#issue-12 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0253.html We're working on it this week. :) (Your OP was pretty clear afaict, but wasn't describing this issue.) ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 18:29:10 UTC