- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:14:01 -0800
- To: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 12/02/2015 22:57, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com> wrote: >>> >>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#repeat-notation >>> Under the second bullet, describing "<auto-repeat>", it says: >>> "... but requires definite minimum track sizes ..." >>> This seems to contradict what is later said for "auto-fill": >>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#valdef-repeat-auto-fill >>> "treating each track as its max track sizing function if that >>> is definite or as its minimum track sizing function otherwise" >> >> >> Those don't contradict, they agree. The first says you need definite >> minimum sizing functions. The second says that you calculate using >> the max sizing function if it's definite, otherwise you use the min >> sizing function (which is definite by definition). > > > Oh, I read "definite minimum track sizes" as "definite min track sizes", > i.e. those tracks that have a "definite min sizing function". Yes, that's correct. All tracks are required to have a definite min sizing function. > Would it possible to rephrase it to avoid this confusion? I'm not sure what the confusion is. :/ ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 01:14:50 UTC