- From: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 23:20:13 +0100
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/02/2015 22:57, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com> wrote: >> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#repeat-notation >> Under the second bullet, describing "<auto-repeat>", it says: >> "... but requires definite minimum track sizes ..." >> This seems to contradict what is later said for "auto-fill": >> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#valdef-repeat-auto-fill >> "treating each track as its max track sizing function if that >> is definite or as its minimum track sizing function otherwise" > > Those don't contradict, they agree. The first says you need definite > minimum sizing functions. The second says that you calculate using > the max sizing function if it's definite, otherwise you use the min > sizing function (which is definite by definition). Oh, I read "definite minimum track sizes" as "definite min track sizes", i.e. those tracks that have a "definite min sizing function". Would it possible to rephrase it to avoid this confusion? "... but requires a definite track size (at least one of the min/max track sizing functions) ...", or simply "... but requires a definite track size ...", leaving the details for later? Thanks, Mats
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2015 22:20:43 UTC