On 4/23/2015 10:23 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: > > 'ua-default' seems too jargony to me. I suspect there is a huge percentage of authors writing CSS that don't know what 'ua' stands for, or even what a "user agent" is. > Unfortunately (?!) I can't claim to be one of those authors. The term "ua-default" makes perfect sense to me. Maybe we could take this opportunity to educate authors on the terminology used in the specifications? The next best alternative would be "browser-default", but the word "browser" alone takes up just as many bytes as "default". Ew. -- Daniel Tan NOVALISTIC <http://NOVALISTIC.com>Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 06:34:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:50 UTC