- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:49:11 +0200
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 07:57, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > >> Proposed mini-patch: >> >> that's doing the scrolling, and the computed value of >> - text-overflow has two values, with the first a non-clip >> + text-overflow has two values, with >> the value of the start edge a non-clip value > > That wording feels awkward to me and confusing since as you said it > depends on ltr/rtl. Trying this instead to hint that there's a level > of indirection involved: > >> the value applying to the start edge being a non-clip value, Yep, that's normatively equivalent, and better worded. Thanks. - Florian
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 08:49:35 UTC