- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:57:02 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > I found a small problem in the text of this section: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui/#ellipsis-scrolling > > > As some content is scrolled into view, it is likely that > other content may scroll out of view on the other side. > If that content's block container element is the same > that's doing the scrolling, and the computed value of > text-overflow has two values, with the first a non-clip > value, then implementations must render an ellipsis/string > in place of the clipped content[...] > > This is correct for ltr text, but not for rtl text, as when using > two values, the first is defined to be the line-left edge, not > the start edge. Took me a little bit to work through all the reasoning for this, but I believe I have verified your analysis. > Proposed mini-patch: > > that's doing the scrolling, and the computed value of > - text-overflow has two values, with the first a non-clip > + text-overflow has two values, with > the value of the start edge a non-clip value That wording feels awkward to me and confusing since as you said it depends on ltr/rtl. Trying this instead to hint that there's a level of indirection involved: > the value applying to the start edge being a non-clip value, Thanks, Tantek
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 05:58:18 UTC