- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:01:12 -0700
- To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Cc: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Christian Biesinger > <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: >> Thanks, I'll do the same. I was wondering if I should stretch it >> anyway even though it doesn't technically participate in flex layout. >> baseline is also the same as flex-start, I assume. >> >> Would be nice if the spec was a bit more explicit about it! > > The Alignment spec is more explicit about it: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-align/#stretch and > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-align/#align-self-property By which I mean, yeah, it's stretched. 'baseline' is also defined there, though you have to chase the definitions a bit. Abspos children of a flex-box aren't in any baseline-sharing group, so baseline-aligning them is a no-op, and they then get aligned as self-start. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 23:01:59 UTC