Re: CSS Classes Custom - by Leonardo Lima

Hi Remy,

But you accepted  this model or I will create new e-mail ?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:12 PM, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com
> wrote:

> Hi Leonardo Lima, Andrea Rendine,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to reach this place :-)
>
> Before moving to the topic you're the most interested in: Just to let you
> know, we usually don't send emails with formatting to this mailing list, to
> decrease mail traffic and make archiving easier. Moreover, we try to reply
> inline and not at the top of the mail. The reason for this choice is that
> it allows people to read one mail and have comments following a logical
> order, like I've done in this email (except this part which isn't a reply
> to your concerns).
>
> > Andrea Rendine [mailto:master.skywalker.88@gmail.com]
> > Hi everybody.
> > I hope this proposal can be technically achievable.
>
> It is, since as you note preprocessors like LESS can already achieve this..
> The question we ask is whether we should support it and how, as doing
> things live in a browser has constraints which you don't have when working
> statically. We also try to make the features we add to CSS take advantage
> of the runtime nature of the operation, so that it's not only a slower
> alternative to a preprocessor, but brings useful additions, too.
>
> > Has there been any similar proposal in the past?
>
> Yes, see http://tabatkins.github.io/specs/css-extend-rule/. Would this
> proposal solve your needs? What's your opinion on it?
>
> Now, as you guess, things which can be improved in CSS are many, and
> comments like yours help prioritize one features against another, while
> developer feedback on www-style isn't the only thing browser vendors take
> in consideration when prioritizing features, of course.
>
>
>
> > Leonardo Lima <leonardo403@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > After that i see css custom properties , think that if creating
> > Class custom for CSS can help us. Nowadays we have that
> > install preprocessor CSS to and using this preprocessor CSS
> > can using variables.
> >
> > I think using (classes custom) can we have an default of
> > ("mixins") a bunch of properties from one rule-set into
> > another rule-set.
> >
> > With this rule dont need use more preprocessor CSS.
> > Now lets change how make CSS variables, see example below:
> >
> > :root{
> > /*create class*/
> > --btn-default{
> >     width:50px;
> >     height:30px;
> >     font-size:15px;
> >     font-weight:bold;
> >     }
> > }
> > .btn-confirm{
> >     class(--btn-default);/*call class*/
> >     color:green;
> > }
>
> (Previous comments also apply here)
>
> I'm not sure I fully understood your thought. Do you propose that we allow
> things like this:
>
> html {
>     --quote: {
>          color: blue; font-size: 150%; font-weight: bold;
>     }
> }
>
> html section {
>     --quote: {
>         color: royalblue; font-size: 125%; font-weight: bold;
>     }
> }
>
> blockquote, q, span.inline-quote {
>     @imports --quote;
> }
>
> Or do you suggest something that would just be like you can do in a
> LESS/SASS preprocessor today?
>
> Best regards,
> François
>



-- 
*Leonardo Lima*
*Web developer*

Fone:  *(051) 8336-5081*
Currículo online: http://leonardo403.github.io/curriculo-leonardo-lima/
Github: https://github.com/leonardo403
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LeonardoLimawebdev/
About.me: http://about.me/leonardolima
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Leonardo403Br