On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems a lot of people are confused by the 'fast' and 'complete' > profiles especially because of the name 'fast'... We have spent a a > lot of time discussing why they even exist. > > Jonathan Kingstonā (@KingstonTime) mentioned to me the same, and so > I'm just wondering if we're doing ourselves extra harm by calling it > 'fast'. It's not 'fast' in so much as 'what we already do and know > how to do in order to do the dynamic selector matching that is CSS'. > > So, what about just renaming them 'static-profile' and > 'dynamic-profile' as you can explain why right there in the spec and > it should be a little easier for people to grok and avoid confusion.. These names are fine with me. It communicates pretty well what they actually mean, and gives a better idea of what things might not be appropriate for the "fast" (dynamic) version. Also, bz gave this set a +1 in another thread. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 16:35:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:53 UTC